Beau Peep Notice Board

Beau Peep Notice Board => Outpourings => Topic started by: Roger Kettle on January 14, 2008, 08:42:37 PM

Title: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 14, 2008, 08:42:37 PM
As I regard this site as a bit of a secret society, I think it's time we had a secret handshake. I suggest rubbing the fleshy bit below the thumbs in a clockwise fashion before tapping index fingers thrice. While I realise this may result in several punches in the face from bewildered strangers, I feel that, in the long term, this will bear fruit. The word will soon spread and imagine the joy when you finally press flesh with a fellow Peepster. Obviously, when this happens, a secret password is then required. Having established handshake rapport, you then shout "DESERT STRIP!" Of course, in certain bars, this may have unfortunate connotations but I think this idea is worth persevering with. Let me know how it goes.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 14, 2008, 09:20:57 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 14, 2008, 09:25:14 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)

How much for?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 14, 2008, 09:35:40 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)

How much for?

3/-
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 14, 2008, 10:49:57 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)

How much for?

3/-

Peeps, the Canadians still use lbs. and oz. but money is in dollars and cents.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 14, 2008, 10:51:23 PM
As I regard this site as a bit of a secret society, I think it's time we had a secret handshake. I suggest rubbing the fleshy bit below the thumbs in a clockwise fashion before tapping index fingers thrice.

Can we have an illustration? Or better still, a YouTube clip.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 14, 2008, 10:52:38 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)

How much for?

3/-

Peeps, the Canadians still use lbs. and oz. but money is in dollars and cents.

I did it in "old money" because I remembered how you keep reminding us how old you are.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 14, 2008, 10:54:36 PM
Right, so if I go out to Canada, I do this with every woman I come across, and eventually I fine Diane.  ::)

How much for?

3/-

Peeps, the Canadians still use lbs. and oz. but money is in dollars and cents.

I did it in "old money" because I remembered how you keep reminding us how old you are.

There's a slap in the post!  :D


You must still remember old money, though.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 14, 2008, 11:22:08 PM
He still buys his drinks with it.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 14, 2008, 11:39:47 PM
I wish! A florin for a pint of good English ale!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 14, 2008, 11:56:43 PM
Can't even get yer nuts for that these days (10p).
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Diane CBPFC on January 15, 2008, 06:37:02 AM
I have been thinking about the handshake Roger and, regretfully, don?t think it is wise for me to participate at this stage of my life. That was how I got pregnant last time.

Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 15, 2008, 10:21:53 AM
I have been thinking about the handshake Roger and, regretfully, don?t think it is wise for me to participate at this stage of my life. That was how I got pregnant last time.


How's the weather, Di? Has that yak come back yet?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 15, 2008, 11:06:34 AM
In Newark if it keeps raining as it is we will probably see Noah and his ark with a yak,
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 15, 2008, 11:30:57 AM
In Newark if it keeps raining as it is we will probably see Noah and his ark with a yak,

Noah and his ark with a yak in Newark...  It sounds like the makings of a tongue-twister.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 15, 2008, 12:45:08 PM
I have been thinking about the handshake Roger and, regretfully, don?t think it is wise for me to participate at this stage of my life. That was how I got pregnant last time.



Right - count me out!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 15, 2008, 01:28:28 PM
What one is my index finger?  :-[
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 15, 2008, 01:59:49 PM
The one next to your big toe.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 15, 2008, 08:21:49 PM
Secret handshakes smacks of the free masons!!!

I don't like secrets of any sorts.

Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 15, 2008, 09:37:15 PM
How old are you AW.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 15, 2008, 09:39:42 PM
Just so mince knows that what he showed me works.
(http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh99/griplen/ab5b00d1.jpg)

We are fostering this dog.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 15, 2008, 10:08:44 PM
Um...Peter, that's a wolf.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 15, 2008, 10:58:02 PM
Um...Peter, that's a wolf.

Sergei Prokofiev, if I'm not mistaken. A delightful composition.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 15, 2008, 10:58:44 PM
It's only got 1 front leg.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 15, 2008, 11:14:48 PM
Well spotted, Colin. If you've still got the Sainsbury's receipt, you can probably take it back, Peter.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 15, 2008, 11:37:43 PM
There's a 3-legged dog on this island. It gets on the bus in Rothesay, and jumps off by the shops in Ardbeg. (I'm sure I've mentioned this before).
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 16, 2008, 12:49:41 AM
...Then it strolls into the saloon bar, and announces, "I've come for the man that shot ma paw!".
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 16, 2008, 12:58:44 AM
...Then it strolls into the saloon bar, and announces, "I've come for the man that shot ma paw!".

Ah the old one's are the best.  ;D
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Malc on January 16, 2008, 07:56:35 AM
Ah, that was a classic exchange, folks, I was laughing fit to bust. This page alone was worth the entrance fee. You all paid too, right?

Quote
There's a 3-legged dog on this island
There's a three legged dog everywhere. My sister Cath's dog Max had three legs.
He started off with four, but got out of the garden only to be hit by a car.


Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 16, 2008, 09:15:31 AM
Um...Peter, that's a wolf.

Sergei Prokofiev, if I'm not mistaken. A delightful composition.
I was wondering who would get in first with this!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Fyodor on January 16, 2008, 10:15:09 AM
I say, I say, I say, my dog's got three legs.
How does he smell?
Awful.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Fyodor on January 16, 2008, 10:18:30 AM
I say, I say, I say, my dog's got three legs.
How does he smell?
Awful.

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
This is a doddle. I think I'll become a jokester.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 16, 2008, 10:20:03 AM
I say, I say, I say, my dog's got three legs.
How does he smell?
Awful.

I love the way you seamlessly join two jokes into something that is bigger and funnier than the sum of its parts. Remarkable!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 16, 2008, 10:45:26 AM
Remarkable!

Well, you got that bit right.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 16, 2008, 10:46:15 AM
Awful.

Well, you got that bit right.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Fyodor on January 16, 2008, 03:27:56 PM
Awful.

Well, you got that bit right.
You're full of awe? Shucks. There's no need, really.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 16, 2008, 04:31:33 PM
He's full of something. "Shucks" is close.  ;D
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 18, 2008, 12:56:13 PM
How old are you AW.

The big 40, yesterday :(. Or rather a nicer way of putting it and still being able to hang on to my thirties is: 39yrs and 12months!

Beautiful dog by the way.  :)
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 18, 2008, 01:22:05 PM
How old are you AW.

The big 40, yesterday :(. Or rather a nicer way of putting it and still being able to hang on to my thirties is: 39yrs and 12months!

Beautiful dog by the way.  :)


Hey, my bird's going to be 40 this year. I usually dump 'em over the birthday period to save money, but this one's a bit of a milestone, so perhaps I should think to do something special - go halves on a party or something... ???

Happy birthday for yesterday AW! You still look youngish to me, darlin'.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 18, 2008, 01:38:19 PM
How old are you AW.

The big 40, yesterday :(. Or rather a nicer way of putting it and still being able to hang on to my thirties is: 39yrs and 12months!

Beautiful dog by the way.  :)



Many thanks the dog is being fostered so if you want a beautiful dog you have to be vetted.
Not by Mince though.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 18, 2008, 01:40:06 PM
Hey, my bird's going to be 40 this year. I usually dump 'em over the birthday period to save money, but this one's a bit of a milestone, so perhaps I should think to do something special - go halves on a party or something... ???

You're a bit of a romantic, aren't you.

(bit = computer term = 1/256)
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 18, 2008, 01:52:58 PM
How old are you AW.

The big 40, yesterday :(. Or rather a nicer way of putting it and still being able to hang on to my thirties is: 39yrs and 12months!

Beautiful dog by the way.  :)

Happy Birthday, AW! Hope you had a great day.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 18, 2008, 02:28:21 PM
How old are you AW.

The big 40, yesterday :(. Or rather a nicer way of putting it and still being able to hang on to my thirties is: 39yrs and 12months!

Beautiful dog by the way.  :)


Hey, my bird's going to be 40 this year.
Happy birthday for yesterday AW! You still look youngish to me, darlin'.

Bet you will be 39 next year.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 18, 2008, 02:44:21 PM
I doubt it, Peter - she's been 27 for over a decade now. Still looks it, to my unbiased, myopic eye.  :-*
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Diane CBPFC on January 18, 2008, 02:47:46 PM
Happy Birthday
A Woman   

(http://orly.avidor.org/img/cakes/cakes.nitza_sister_40_birthday_1_04-07.s.jpg)
best wishes from the C.B.P.F.C.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 18, 2008, 03:21:06 PM
Awwww thankyou for birthday wishes.

Indeed, next year I will be 27 again.

Tarq's enjoyed his balloon flight that I got him last year for his birthday, so much, that he's booked for me to go up. Should be well good! :) :-*

As for the cute hound, I'd have him but I've already fostered Tarq's! Woof woof.

Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 18, 2008, 04:51:27 PM
Happy Birthday
A Woman   

(http://orly.avidor.org/img/cakes/cakes.nitza_sister_40_birthday_1_04-07.s.jpg)
best wishes from the C.B.P.F.C.

I wont a slice please.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 18, 2008, 05:33:56 PM
Happy Birthday
A Woman   

(http://orly.avidor.org/img/cakes/cakes.nitza_sister_40_birthday_1_04-07.s.jpg)
best wishes from the C.B.P.F.C.

I wont a slice please.

Peter - you didn't play the part of a policeman in "'allo 'allo", did you?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 18, 2008, 06:08:18 PM
Happy Birthday
A Woman   

(http://orly.avidor.org/img/cakes/cakes.nitza_sister_40_birthday_1_04-07.s.jpg)
best wishes from the C.B.P.F.C.

I wont a slice please.

Peter - you didn't play the part of a policeman in "'allo 'allo", did you?

That brought another grin.  ;D
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Rob Baker on January 18, 2008, 06:10:21 PM
Good Moaning.  And another from me ;D
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 18, 2008, 06:13:39 PM
Good Moaning.  And another from me ;D

Goad moaning Wob.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 18, 2008, 06:23:35 PM
Good Moaning.  And another from me ;D
Hi, Rob! How was Portugal? Any snaps?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Rob Baker on January 18, 2008, 06:32:22 PM
Well I spent most of the time sitting in the sun, I read a few books and I pigged out on sardines and Super Bock.  Agony.  I'm glad to be back really.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Malc on January 19, 2008, 01:41:58 AM
Quote
so much, that he's booked for me to go up. Should be well good!

It's refreshing to hear a woman with such a healthy attitude to sex. Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

Good moaning indeed.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 11:24:08 AM
Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

That should be "Tarquin's having ...", otherwise it's a fused participle. See Fowler's Modern English Usage.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 11:43:36 AM
Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

That should be "Tarquin's having ...", otherwise it's a fused participle. See Fowler's Modern English Usage.

No, it shouldn't be. It just shouldn't, d'you hear?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 11:45:19 AM
...a fused participle.

And can we stop with the sex talk now please - this is a family forum.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 12:18:32 PM
And can we stop with the sex talk now please - this is a family forum.

There's loads more in Fowler's Modern English Usage.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:08:21 PM
And can we stop with the sex talk now please - this is a family forum.

There's loads more in Fowler's Modern English Usage.

There's lots more in Fowler's Modern English Usage.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 01:23:21 PM
Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

That should be "Tarquin's having ...", otherwise it's a fused participle. See Fowler's Modern English Usage.

I think it would look wrong: "Tarquin is having to make an appointment would be part of the....."

Are you sure that foul Fowler is correct, Mince?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:27:45 PM
Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

That should be "Tarquin's having ...", otherwise it's a fused participle. See Fowler's Modern English Usage.

I think it would look wrong: "Tarquin is having to make an appointment would be part of the....."

Are you sure that foul Fowler is correct, Mince?


No, it actually is short for "Tarquin, his having to make an appointment". I hate to agree with Mince.  ::)
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:28:39 PM
No, the "Tarquin's" is not short for "Tarquin is". It's the possessive.

Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

If you change the Tarquin to a pronoun, it becomes:

His having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

And so "Tarquin" should be the possessive "Tarquin's".
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:29:51 PM
My explanation was shorter, you twerp.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 01:32:37 PM
No, the "Tarquin's" is not short for "Tarquin is". It's the possessive.

Tarquin having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

If you change the Tarquin to a pronoun, it becomes:

His having to make an appointment would be part of the foreplay, I take it?

And so "Tarquin" should be the possessive "Tarquin's".

Do you mean that 'having' belongs to Tarquin?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:33:14 PM
No, it actually is short for "Tarquin, his having to make an appointment". I hate to agree with Mince.  ::)

I have not seen that structure before. You seem to have placed the gerund in apposition to Tarquin, which to me seems wrong. So as much as you agree with me, I have to disagree with you.

How would you rewrite (in your structure) this one?

I hate Peepmaster's thinking he knows the right answer.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:35:50 PM
Do you mean that 'having' belongs to Tarquin?

Yes.

Eating chocolate is fun.  The subject is "eating chocolate".

John's eating chocolate is fun. The subject is "John's eating chocolate".

John eating chocolate is fun. The subject is neither "John" nor "eating chocolate", and so it's wrong, a fused participle.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:37:54 PM
The possessive "Tarquin's" is short for "Tarquin, his".

It's like "Tarquin's underpants" is short for "Tarquin, his underpants".

In the same way, "Fanny's satsuma" is short for "Fanny, her satsuma", but you still have an "s".
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:40:00 PM
Do you mean that 'having' belongs to Tarquin?

Yes.

Eating chocolate is fun.  The subject is "eating chocolate".

John's eating chocolate is fun. The subject is "John's eating chocolate".

John eating chocolate is fun. The subject is neither "John" nor "eating chocolate", and so it's wrong, a fused participle.

That's not right! How come John's got all the chocolate?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:40:19 PM
It does not always work, especially when the person is female.

I hate her talking loudly in the library.

Here the "her" could be a noun (like "him") or a possessive (like "his"), so it's impossible to tell if it's wrong.

But if you use the name, it would be:

I hate Jane's talking loudly in the library.

But a more natural way of saying that is:

I hate the fact that Jane talks loudly in the library.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 19, 2008, 01:40:29 PM
When did this turn into a "back to school" forum?
This is getting rad, redik.
This is getting out of order.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 01:43:30 PM
It does not always work, especially when the person is female.

I hate her talking loudly in the library.

Here the "her" could be a noun (like "him") or a possessive (like "his"), so it's impossible to tell if it's wrong.

But if you use the name, it would be:

I hate Jane's talking loudly in the library.

But a more natural way of saying that is:

I hate the fact that Jane talks loudly in the library.

I'd bloody talk loudly in the library if John had all the chocolate!  >:(
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:43:54 PM
The possessive "Tarquin's" is short for "Tarquin, his".

It's like "Tarquin's underpants" is short for "Tarquin, his underpants".

In the same way, "Fanny's satsuma" is short for "Fanny, her satsuma", but you still have an "s".

Yes, I remember reading that somewhere. You are talking about the origin of the possessive. I shall have to look that one up to ensure it's not a myth.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:46:48 PM
John's hiding the chocolate demonstrates his selfishness.

We could write a whole story this way.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 19, 2008, 01:50:27 PM
John's hiding the chocolate demonstrates his selfishness.

We could write a whole story this way.

Please don't.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 01:51:42 PM
Colin's trembling at the prospect made the whole thing more appealing.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 01:59:32 PM
 >:( Look, let's clear one thing up. I don't have to make appointments, OKAY? And if I did, there'd be none available before July. And I don't wear underpants - I'm a true Scotsman.

Look, let's clear three things up...
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 02:02:35 PM
I'm sure this is all b******s: I think Mince is having us on.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 02:03:52 PM
Tarquin's clearing things up didn't help.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 02:04:47 PM
I'm sure this is all b******s: I think Mince is having us on.

http://www.russinoff.com/david/usage/fused.html
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 02:07:41 PM
I take it all back, Mince. THIS is a load of b******s:

   fused participle

The progressive form of a verb (ending in -ing), in addition to its primary function, may serve as either a noun or an adjective, in which case it is called a gerund or a present participle, respectively. One often faces a choice between these two usages. For example, when a gerund is modified by a possessive pronoun or noun and appears as the object of a verb or preposition, the modifier may in some cases be replaced by its objective form. The gerund is thereby transformed into an adjectival participle, and the meaning of the sentence changes accordingly. Thus, I heard your crying becomes I heard you crying. As Brown observes, "In the use of participles and of verbal nouns, the leading word in sense, should always be made the leading or governing word in the construction." Thus, he favors the construction He was sensible to his strength's declining, in which he takes the gerund to be "the leading word in sense", but rejects the possessive in He felt his strength's declining, insisting on strength as the direct object and relegating declining to the role of attached adjective.

In some cases, the wrong choice results in nonsense, as illustrated by another of Brown's examples. The sentence He mentions Newton's writing of a commentary, though somewhat awkward, is preferable in his judgement to the alternative, He mentions Newton writing a commentary, which "though not uncommon, is still more objectionable because it makes the leading word in sense the adjunct in construction." In fact, the latter version defies grammatical analysis altogether, for Newton, which has the unmistakable form of a substantive, cannot be cast as the direct object here, as it is the writing and not the writer that is being mentioned.

The same problem is seen in the statement below.

    We witnessed them being dragged off on ropes to their death, and could hear them being killed. *
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 02:09:27 PM
Is it cos I is thick?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 02:10:46 PM
Sadly, it all makes sense to me.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 02:51:54 PM
The possessive "Tarquin's" is short for "Tarquin, his".

It's like "Tarquin's underpants" is short for "Tarquin, his underpants".

In the same way, "Fanny's satsuma" is short for "Fanny, her satsuma", but you still have an "s".

Yes, I remember reading that somewhere. You are talking about the origin of the possessive. I shall have to look that one up to ensure it's not a myth.

I know it's not a bloody myth! I remember getting teached it at grammar school all those years ago!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 19, 2008, 05:38:17 PM
I think the written language is crap! And yes, I'm crap at it.

At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

If you exchange a bunch of written words with an educated bod' (or overly educated specialist) and a run of the mill, jo bloggs, thick sh**e off the streets, then what's the worth of the written language then? Nowt. They don't 'get' each other.

It all smacks of 'I'm better than you'.

There, I've 'said' my piece!  ;D

Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 05:42:08 PM
I think the written language is crap! And yes, I'm crap at it.

At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

If you exchange a bunch of written words with an educated bod' (or overly educated specialist) and a run of the mill, jo bloggs, thick sh**e off the streets, then what's the worth of the written language then? Nowt. They don't 'get' each other.

It all smacks of 'I'm better than you'.

There, I've 'said' my piece!  ;D



Hmm.. interesting. Maybe women should have their own language.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 05:50:35 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 19, 2008, 05:51:11 PM
I think the written language is crap! And yes, I'm crap at it.

At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

If you exchange a bunch of written words with an educated bod' (or overly educated specialist) and a run of the mill, jo bloggs, thick sh**e off the streets, then what's the worth of the written language then? Nowt. They don't 'get' each other.

It all smacks of 'I'm better than you'.

There, I've 'said' my piece!  ;D



Hmm.. interesting. Maybe women should have their own language.

oh we do, you've just not 'listened' enough to have learnt it yet! :P
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 06:00:21 PM
oh we do, you've just not 'listened' enough to have learnt it yet! :P

It's called gibberish, isn't it?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 19, 2008, 06:16:53 PM
oh we do, you've just not 'listened' enough to have learnt it yet! :P

It's called gibberish, isn't it?

Yes, but only when it's misquoted or mis-understood by someone!  ;D
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: A Woman on January 19, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?

What if he's lost his hands? Or had them removed, as is the wont of some countries!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 06:22:17 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?

What if he's lost his hands? Or had them removed, as is the wont of some countries!

Then he certainly wouldn't be able to say goodbye to Mince, that's for sure.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Roger Kettle on January 19, 2008, 06:48:07 PM
I was at Tannadice today. Dundee United won 3-0.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 06:49:21 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?

What if he's lost his hands? Or had them removed, as is the wont of some countries!

Then he certainly wouldn't be able to say goodbye to Mince, that's for sure.

That's a thought. He'd be unable to flick the V-signs.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 06:54:48 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?

What if he's lost his hands? Or had them removed, as is the wont of some countries!

Then he certainly wouldn't be able to say goodbye to Mince, that's for sure.

That's a thought. He'd be unable to flick the V-signs.

 ::) Thanks, Peepsie.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 06:56:33 PM
I was at Tannadice today. Dundee United won 3-0.

I understand Dundee United won 3-0, Roger. Have a sit down with hot sweet tea, and maybe a brandy. I'm told that's good for shock.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 06:57:45 PM
At least with the oral language you can 'read' the tone of voice , 'read' the body language and see the true meaning in the eyes. Eyes are the window to the soul, you know.

And if they have blue eyes then they are telling the truth (or who cares if they are telling the truth) ...

I don't go for all this sentimental hogwash. What if the person has had his eyes removed?

What if he's lost his hands? Or had them removed, as is the wont of some countries!

Then he certainly wouldn't be able to say goodbye to Mince, that's for sure.

That's a thought. He'd be unable to flick the V-signs.

 ::) Thanks, Peepsie.

In case people thought you meant waving, Tarks.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 07:08:07 PM
Am I in trouble again?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 07:14:34 PM
No, it actually is short for "Tarquin, his having to make an appointment". I hate to agree with Mince.  ::)

I have not seen that structure before. You seem to have placed the gerund in apposition to Tarquin, which to me seems wrong. So as much as you agree with me, I have to disagree with you.

How would you rewrite (in your structure) this one?

I hate Peepmaster's thinking he knows the right answer.

I hate his, (Peepmaster's), thinking he knows the right answer.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 07:15:01 PM
Am I in trouble again?

Are you ever out of trouble, Mince?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 07:18:27 PM
I hate his, (Peepmaster's), thinking he knows the right answer.

You're making it up now.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 19, 2008, 08:45:20 PM
Glad you watch a great game Roger
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 19, 2008, 09:14:08 PM
Glad you watch a great game Roger

Ed is missing.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Vulture on January 19, 2008, 09:19:45 PM
Glad you watch a great game Roger

Ed is missing.

Perhaps Ed didn't want to go!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 19, 2008, 09:38:54 PM
If Ed was there dundee united would have scored 4
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Mince on January 19, 2008, 09:54:34 PM
If Ed was there dundee united would have scored 4

Scored for who?
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 19, 2008, 09:57:48 PM
If Ed was there dundee united would have scored 4

Scored for who?

The Harlem Globetrotters.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: peter on January 19, 2008, 10:01:37 PM
As the other side did not score and DU scored 3 then when Ed scored that would make 4 not 1
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tom on January 19, 2008, 10:56:58 PM
Maybe Ed was with John and the chocolate.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Malc on January 19, 2008, 11:11:56 PM
I feel I have wandered into the secure ward.

I already know that the next post is going to say "well it couldn't have been very secure, could it?" so let's continue from there.
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 20, 2008, 12:13:29 AM
Wibble wibble!
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Colin on January 20, 2008, 12:18:55 AM
(http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/4127/wibble6nt.jpg)
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: The Peepmaster on January 20, 2008, 12:52:52 AM
I was trying to be discreet, but noticed that Pete had knocked off "ed".
Title: Re: Secret Handshake.
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on January 20, 2008, 01:12:59 AM
Live and let live, I say.