I don't like bad language in films, or nudity or kissing. I should have been a Wee Free minister or an Imam.
In my personal life I like nudity, kissing and swearing, I swear a lot in the right company (never in front of ladies or kids) I do like naked women as a concept, and I especially like kissing girls, but seeing the stars on the screen in mouth to mouth combat...? Yeuch. It just seems so contrived.
I also have a thing about smoking in movies. I'm not on an anti smoking crusade here - all my family, mother, brothers and sisters smoke like chimneys, and I love them all. My dad was the only non-smoker, and he died of cancer (of the colon).
No, on the screen I hate seeing actors light up, because I strongly suspect that (secret) tobacco money is funding the movie.
Getting movies financed is the hardest thing in filmmaking, and even Spielberg has had to go overseas with his begging bowl to get finance from Europe and China. One of the great stars of the modern age got his start in Spaghetti westerns, there was no-one in the US who could finance the films that would have Eastwood as the star.
So I reckon Hollywood approaches cigarette makers like Philip Morris on a regular basis to secretly fund much of the crap that is coming out these days. The trade-off is that stars are obliged to smoke in the movies, and it's all Tinseltown's best kept secret (apart from the fact Cruise, Pitt, Jolie and De Caprio are gay). It's what made smoking popular in the first place, and the tobacco industry wants that back.