Author Topic: Columbo  (Read 16098 times)

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Columbo
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2007, 10:57:11 PM »
Marginally better than Acquadella O Latterino Fritto I suppose.
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Malc

  • Guest
Re: Columbo
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2007, 11:44:36 PM »
Amerigo Vespucci discovered the Americas (mostly Central and South). Columbus discovered the West Indies. John Cabot (backed by Britain) is credited with discovering the North American mainland.

Malc

  • Guest
Re: Columbo
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2007, 01:22:40 AM »
I loved Columbo, it was a very clever series, in the sense that it married Holmesian methods with a love for the underdog. The baddies were inevitably smooth and arrogant, looking down their noses at poor old Columbo in his broken down car and his crumpled coat.

It's a very successful, populist formula, used by Chaplin, and if I was planning a new drama series I'd pretty much nick it.

Offline Diane CBPFC

  • .
  • Posts: 4538
Re: Columbo
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2007, 02:32:36 AM »
The average IQ of the Beau Peep board sure soared since Malc joined.

I too will try to think of something clever. I don't think it will be today though.

People will come from strange lands to hear me speak my words of wisdom. They will ask me the secret of life and I will tell them. Then maybe I'll finish off with a song. The Nomad

Malc

  • Guest
Re: Columbo
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2007, 06:56:27 AM »
Not many people know that Einstein was hard of hearing and that led to his discovery of the theory of relativity.

His first job was as a very bad busker in Manchester. He set up in Albert Square and started to play his banjolele. His caterwauling prompted a passer-by to comment: "Ee... 'e could empty t' square".

Offline Tarquin Thunderthighs lll

  • .
  • Posts: 5847
  • They call me Tarqs... and other stuff.
Re: Columbo
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2007, 09:53:57 AM »
That's excruciating, Malc - bravo!

Interestingly, most people assume America got it's name from Amerigo Vespucci, but this is not the case. Had this been the case, we would have had a 'special relationship' with Vespuccia today, since always new lands were named after a surname and never a forename.

America was actually named after the chief patron of John Cabot's voyage (Cabot was Italian, real name Giovanni Caboto), a Welshman and wealthy Bristol merchant, Richard Ameryk.

Columbus actually thought the world was pear-shaped and a quarter of its actual size. The closest he came to setting foot on America's mainland was the Bahamas, and he made his crew swear an oath that, if asked, they would say they had reached India. No-one is absolutely certain of his nationality - the main evidence points to him being the son of a Genoese weaver, but there are also reasonable claims he may have been Sephardic Jewish, Spanish, Corsican, Portuguese, Catalan or Greek. He preferred to be known as either Columbo or Colon.
I apologise, in advance.

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Columbo
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2007, 10:00:32 PM »
COLUMBO = LOB MUCUS

:o

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Columbo
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2007, 10:10:30 PM »
COLUMBO = LOB MUCUS

:o

Columbus actually!

COLUMBO = COOL BUM
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Columbo
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2007, 10:11:46 PM »
I noticed that one as well but didn't post it because I thought it was infantile.

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Columbo
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2007, 10:13:21 PM »
Yes, but yours wasn't correct. At least mine was!
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Columbo
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2007, 10:14:27 PM »
Oh, I meant Columbus . . .

Offline Tarquin Thunderthighs lll

  • .
  • Posts: 5847
  • They call me Tarqs... and other stuff.
Re: Columbo
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2007, 11:10:17 PM »
Why do we bother, Malcolm?
I apologise, in advance.

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Columbo
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2007, 11:13:48 PM »
. . . because it delays again having to deal with your sad existence?  ;D

Malc

  • Guest
Re: Columbo
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2007, 11:48:42 PM »
Don't drag me into this. ::)

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Columbo
« Reply #29 on: May 30, 2007, 12:41:47 AM »
Malc, "sad existence" referred to Tarquin's life, not you.