Beau Peep Notice Board

Beau Peep Notice Board => Outpourings => Topic started by: The Peepmaster on April 01, 2010, 11:49:39 PM

Title: Gracie Fields
Post by: The Peepmaster on April 01, 2010, 11:49:39 PM
Just watching a bio on TV.

That "Wish Me Luck As I Wave You Goodbye" rendition has haunted me for years. I love the high notes she reaches.

Not very "rock-and-roll", is it?
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Roger Kettle on April 02, 2010, 09:42:03 AM
Rock and roll-on girdle.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: The Peepmaster on April 02, 2010, 02:24:50 PM
I wonder when that will make it into a strip, Roger..  ;D

I found the programme quite interesting and it aroused great feelings of patriotism.

In much the same way as when World Records are conquered, keeping this nation great:

Geordie claims record for wearing most underpants (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/8600616.stm)
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Vulture on April 02, 2010, 03:44:15 PM
I wonder when that will make it into a strip, Roger..  ;D

I found the programme quite interesting and it aroused great feelings of patriotism.

In much the same way as when World Records are conquered, keeping this nation great:

Geordie claims record for wearing most underpants (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/8600616.stm)


.... and Yes! ... his bum DID look big in all of them!
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on April 02, 2010, 04:07:40 PM
Geordie claims record for wearing most underpants (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/8600616.stm)

That looks eminently beatable to me. I'm going into training... after I've gone into Marks & Spencers.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Vulture on April 02, 2010, 05:50:06 PM
I wonder if you could get more thongs on than underpants....?
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Bilthehut on April 02, 2010, 06:09:39 PM
That might smart!  Ouch!
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: The Peepmaster on April 02, 2010, 06:09:58 PM
I wonder if you could get more thongs on than underpants....?

That would surely be quite painful, Vulch, and would look stupid.  ..0

I accept there'd be less weight to carry, but I'm sure the boffins behind the world record attempt will have eliminated thongs as an appropriate clothing item.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Vulture on April 02, 2010, 06:55:44 PM
I wonder if you could get more thongs on than underpants....?

That would surely be quite painful, Vulch, and would look stupid.  ..0

Oh, and the guy with 211 underpants on didn't look stupid.....?

I accept there'd be less weight to carry, but I'm sure the boffins behind the world record attempt will have eliminated thongs as an appropriate clothing item.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: The Peepmaster on April 02, 2010, 07:02:05 PM
I wonder if you could get more thongs on than underpants....?

That would surely be quite painful, Vulch, and would look stupid.  ..0

Oh, and the guy with 211 underpants on didn't look stupid.....?

I accept there'd be less weight to carry, but I'm sure the boffins behind the world record attempt will have eliminated thongs as an appropriate clothing item.

Just having 211 pairs of underpants on doesn't automatically make you look stupid, does it? It depends how you carry it off.

Let's keep an open mind, please.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on April 02, 2010, 07:43:30 PM
Just having 211 pairs of underpants on doesn't automatically make you look stupid, does it?

Rather depends on whether or not they're Y-fronts, doesn't it?
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: The Peepmaster on April 02, 2010, 07:45:18 PM
We've gone off topic. I remember when all this was Fields.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Tarquin Thunderthighs lll on April 02, 2010, 08:00:24 PM
We've gone off topic. I remember when all this was Fields.


(http://media.bigoo.ws/content/smile/happy/happy_64.gif)

Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Vulture on April 02, 2010, 08:13:10 PM
I wonder if you could get more thongs on than underpants....?

That would surely be quite painful, Vulch, and would look stupid.  ..0

Oh, and the guy with 211 underpants on didn't look stupid.....?

I accept there'd be less weight to carry, but I'm sure the boffins behind the world record attempt will have eliminated thongs as an appropriate clothing item.

Just having 211 pairs of underpants on doesn't automatically make you look stupid, does it? It depends how you carry it off.


Yes, it does. The guy in the video looked really stupid AND his bum looked big!!!

Let's keep an open mind, please.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Malc on April 02, 2010, 10:09:34 PM
Quote
We've gone off topic. I remember when all this was Fields.

I wish I too had an 'applause' smiley for that gem. You should be a cartoonist or something.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Bilthehut on April 02, 2010, 10:53:09 PM
Just Google 'clapping smiley' = www.smileyhut.com
(http://www.smileyhut.com/happy/clap2.gif) (http://www.smileyhut.com)
(http://www.smileyhut.com/hoosierdue/GB.gif) (http://www.smileyhut.com)
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Tom on April 03, 2010, 04:17:06 AM
(http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/groooansmileyf.gif) (http://www.millan.net)

There should also be a teehee smiley here, but due to circumstances beyond my control, there isn't.
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Bilthehut on April 03, 2010, 05:36:21 PM
Tom,

I bet it's going  (http://www.smileyhut.com/silly/teehee.gif) (http://www.smileyhut.com) and hiding somewhere you can't see it,
when it should be going  (http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/files/snicker.gif) (http://www.pricescope.com)
Title: Re: Gracie Fields
Post by: Tom on April 03, 2010, 09:04:23 PM
Yay! You found it!  ;D