Author Topic: Who is in the lead?  (Read 6657 times)

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2012, 03:00:44 PM »
I have been careful not to break any rules by asking direct questions.

Are you saying that in order not to break any rules you have asked direct questions?

I still think you should be penalised.

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2012, 03:08:37 PM »
No - I took great care not to ask any direct questions, as that is not allowed.
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2012, 04:15:17 PM »
Who agrees we should just disqualify him for being annoying?

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2012, 06:19:50 PM »
Highly skilled, is the phrase you're seeking, I believe. <sanctimonioussmiley>
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5834
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2012, 08:42:48 PM »
Post by Mince: "I can't believe Peepmaster asked you what your favourite hairstyle is. Diane, tell me the answer, not him, because that is such a weird question. (Don't you hate him more than anyone else here?)"


If those are not direct questions/statements, I don't know what are! Disqualification?
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2012, 09:12:29 PM »
No chance! I am just monopolising on your outrageous behaviour.

Sandy Buttcheeks

  • Guest
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2012, 10:48:51 PM »
Who agrees we should just disqualify him for being annoying?

Mince, you have my support...

Highly skilled, is the phrase you're seeking, I believe. <sanctimonioussmiley>

...in disqualifying him for highly skill-duggery.


Let's get this competition back to being honest and above board, where the winner will be a winner because he's won winningly. I just can't stomach deceit, sneakiness and underhand tactics. (Throw Peeps out and we'll split his points, Mince).

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #22 on: November 29, 2012, 08:19:02 AM »
Or we could just delete all our own posts and then tell Diane that this was completely Peepmaster's idea.

Sandy Buttcheeks

  • Guest
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #23 on: November 29, 2012, 10:37:54 PM »
It's a deal, Mince. Let's disprove the theory that cheats never win.

Offline Bilthehut

  • .
  • Posts: 1720
  • Really, real person (but not blue)
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #24 on: November 29, 2012, 11:57:53 PM »
Or we could just delete all our own posts and then tell Diane that this was completely Peepmaster's idea.
I like the idea there.  However, peepsie has probably been scanning the posts to save as evidence.

If one cannot ask direct questions, the only option is indirect ones. 

Sandy Buttcheeks

  • Guest
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2012, 10:57:31 PM »
I now claim number 13 for myself without even needing further verification.    ;D

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #26 on: December 08, 2012, 09:46:33 AM »
So who's winning?

Jack

  • Guest
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #27 on: December 08, 2012, 11:15:22 AM »
Diane.

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6960
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #28 on: December 08, 2012, 02:12:11 PM »
With Peepmaster a close second - all girls together, I suppose.

Sandy Buttcheeks

  • Guest
Re: Who is in the lead?
« Reply #29 on: December 08, 2012, 10:21:41 PM »
I'm not winning. I may have to throw a tantrum.