Well, it's mostly the Mail Online, and how they write each unsensational article in the most sensational way, often omitting pertinent facts to achieve this, such as asteroids on a collision course with Earth, where collision is redefined as millions of miles away. And then there's the article detailing the recent meta-study about low salt intake being bad for you, even though the meta-study makes inferences about relationships using data from smaller studies that were not designed to assess these relationships. The study was called into question ages ago as garbage-in, garbage-out, and yet the article makes no mention of this. And if I can find the information in less than a minute, why can't the so-called scientific experts who write the article?