Author Topic: James III (Read 2583 times)

The Peepmaster · « **on:** November 11, 2007, 09:10:32 PM »

I was just thinking about James III, and got to wondering if he would ever have been called "Jim", seeing as it was so long ago.

Mince · « **Reply #1 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:11:54 PM »

He's dead, Jim.

The Peepmaster · « **Reply #2 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:24:01 PM »

He's dead, Jim.

I realise he's dead. I mean he was born in 1451 and was 9 years old when he came to the throne. :

Vulture · « **Reply #3 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:31:35 PM »

Are you going to stick to 1/8, Mince: or is that just your name for today?

peter · « **Reply #4 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:38:05 PM »

He's dead, Jim.

He dead Jim but not as we know it.

Mince · « **Reply #5 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:41:40 PM »

Are you going to stick to 1/8, Mince. Or is that just your name for today?

I am ? inclined to change it.

peter · « **Reply #6 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:43:24 PM »

Then you would be 1/16th

The Peepmaster · « **Reply #7 on:** November 11, 2007, 09:46:26 PM »

Having Kings with fractions after their names would have been fun! King "Half"ur, would have had one in his name!

Roger Kettle · « **Reply #8 on:** November 11, 2007, 10:15:13 PM »

Oh, dear, here we go again.

Mince · « **Reply #9 on:** November 11, 2007, 10:20:05 PM »

I know, Roger. This whole topic is making me feel tenth.

Vulture · « **Reply #10 on:** November 11, 2007, 11:09:01 PM »

Malc · « **Reply #11 on:** November 12, 2007, 12:04:42 PM »

May the 1/4 be with you.

Fyodor · « **Reply #12 on:** November 12, 2007, 07:10:57 PM »

James the what?

Paddy O'Flaherty

Beau Peep Notice Board