Author Topic: Roger's Contribution  (Read 4672 times)

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Roger's Contribution
« on: February 10, 2008, 06:21:22 PM »
Roger, in another topic, stated that he was the least funny contributor to this site, a comment that, by itself, seems throwaway, but on closer reflection, and given that the vast number of people who post on this board, a board that until recently, or at least until very recently, has become close to the most, if not the most, and probably in some strange way, what with the enthusiasm for Beau Peep shown here not only in this forum but also, in an odd way, which I suppose as they say there you are.

Vulture

  • Guest
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2008, 06:27:28 PM »
Roger, in another topic, stated that he was the least funny contributor to this site, a comment that, by itself, seems throwaway, but on closer reflection, and given that the vast number of people who post on this board, a board that until recently, or at least until very recently, has become close to the most, if not the most, and probably in some strange way, what with the enthusiasm for Beau Peep shown here not only in this forum but also, in an odd way, which I suppose as they say there you are.

Wot?

Offline Roger Kettle

  • Roger
  • *
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ho! Ho! £$%^&* Ho!
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2008, 08:38:20 PM »
Roger, in another topic, stated that he was the least funny contributor to this site, a comment that, by itself, seems throwaway, but on closer reflection, and given that the vast number of people who post on this board, a board that until recently, or at least until very recently, has become close to the most, if not the most, and probably in some strange way, what with the enthusiasm for Beau Peep shown here not only in this forum but also, in an odd way, which I suppose as they say there you are.
This is very hurtful.

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2008, 08:40:34 PM »
Roger, in another topic, stated that he was the least funny contributor to this site, a comment that, by itself, seems throwaway, but on closer reflection, and given that the vast number of people who post on this board, a board that until recently, or at least until very recently, has become close to the most, if not the most, and probably in some strange way, what with the enthusiasm for Beau Peep shown here not only in this forum but also, in an odd way, which I suppose as they say there you are.
This is very hurtful.

Your response is the first post on this thread that I've understood, Roger.
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Vulture

  • Guest
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2008, 08:59:35 PM »
Roger, in another topic, stated that he was the least funny contributor to this site, a comment that, by itself, seems throwaway, but on closer reflection, and given that the vast number of people who post on this board, a board that until recently, or at least until very recently, has become close to the most, if not the most, and probably in some strange way, what with the enthusiasm for Beau Peep shown here not only in this forum but also, in an odd way, which I suppose as they say there you are.
This is very hurtful.
This is indecipherable!

peter

  • Guest
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2008, 09:05:32 PM »
What's it say. Comprendo.

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2008, 09:10:58 PM »
This is very hurtful.

Could you be more specific? Which part?

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2008, 10:21:23 PM »
This is very hurtful.

Could you be more specific? Which part?

The hurtful bit.  ::)
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2008, 10:25:31 PM »
It must have been that second parenthesis.

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2008, 10:33:05 PM »
It must have been that second parenthesis.

I always blame the parenthesises.  ::)
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Mince

  • .
  • Posts: 6978
  • Utter Waste of Time
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2008, 11:03:27 PM »
They should lock them up and throw away the commas.

Offline Tarquin Thunderthighs lll

  • .
  • Posts: 5847
  • They call me Tarqs... and other stuff.
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2008, 12:24:46 AM »
I walked into my English class some 35 years ago, with my pal, Scott Chisholm, to see the word EUPHEMISM chalked on the board in big, bold letters and underlined.

Scott looked at it thoughtfully, before declaring, "That's that mercy killing, isn't it?".

And you know, it's suddenly dawned on me after all these years, in a funny sort of way, he was right.
I apologise, in advance.

Malc

  • Guest
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2008, 12:31:53 PM »
Quote
it's suddenly dawned on me after all these years, in a funny sort of way, he was right

That tag line fits almost any story involving oneself, one other and a misunderstanding.

"I even had to go to the barber shop with my daughter Amy in tow because she was such a daddy's girl. My mate Bob said "Hello Ivy", and it's suddenly dawned on me after all these years, in a funny sort of way, he was right.

Offline The Peepmaster

  • .
  • Posts: 5845
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2008, 12:36:12 PM »
"There's nowt so queer as folk", as someone once said.
Nostalgia is not what it used to be. 😟

Offline Tarquin Thunderthighs lll

  • .
  • Posts: 5847
  • They call me Tarqs... and other stuff.
Re: Roger's Contribution
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2008, 12:57:16 PM »
"There's nowt so queer as folk", as someone once said.

Except West Highland Terriers.
I apologise, in advance.