Thank you, thank you! I shall try not to make a habit of it. Most kind!
This evening, I've been educating myself (
) a little in the United States electoral college voting system this, as well as enjoying a few robust Internet exchanges with a Trump-supporting cartoonist friend (who I normally get on very well with) as he tries to defend how they do things. It's a joke! Lord knows our own electoral system is flawed enough, but over there, they vote for 'Electors' to make the decision for them, each state having an allocation of these people, mostly pledged to one of the two main candidates/parties. But they
can, and occasionally
do, change their minds, before formally declaring in mid-December. Those that change their minds are known as 'faithless electors', and there have never been enough of them to have actually changed the outcome of an election.
It would take about 20 of them to overturn this one, and place Hillary Clinton at the White House door where she probably belongs, having polled around 200,000 more votes than Trump, and who only won because of this iniquitous system. But even in the unprecedented event of that happening (and I guess if any result might set the precedent, this would be it), Congress would then slap it down again when IT gets to decide in early January, before Inauguration Day on January 20th. Basically, the people are not trusted to make the right choice, at least not entirely.
My cartoonist friend tried to explain it to me, but I was horrified when what started as an attempt to justify 'cultural differences' as reason enough for the different values placed on votes in some areas, eventually boiled down to why should a drug addict's vote count the same as a thoracic surgeon's. Unbelievably judgemental bollocks!
So, Trump was right after all - it was rigged!